
For the sixth consecutive month, Omri Hurwitz Media is leading the latest PR rankings, extending a run that shows the public relations industry is increasingly measured not simply by the number of campaigns launched, but by the meaningful media attention those campaigns generate.
Hurwitz, the founder and CEO of Omri Hurwitz Media (OHM), has built a media-focused operation around securing visibility for technology companies, startups and high-profile executives. According to the latest company figures, OHM is currently generating 622% more media coverage per client than its number two competitor, a gap that illustrates the scale of its lead in a crowded PR market.
A Different Approach to Media Coverage
Traditional public relations has often centered on relationships between agencies and individual journalists, with success measured through a combination of placements, impressions and brand awareness. The modern media environment, however, has made that equation considerably more complicated.
Companies are competing for attention across traditional publications, digital media, newsletters, podcasts, television and increasingly AI-driven discovery platforms. A single announcement can quickly disappear among thousands of other stories competing for the same audience.
OHM’s model centers on controlling more of the media infrastructure around a campaign. Rather than relying exclusively on conventional outreach, the company has developed a network of connections, media equities, and media outlets that it owns or operates. That infrastructure gives the firm additional channels to amplify client stories.
The result is a strategy designed to create multiple points of visibility around a company rather than treating a single media placement as the end goal.
The 622% Coverage Gap
The latest ranking puts the difference between OHM and its closest competitor into unusually concrete terms.
OHM is currently achieving 622% more media coverage per client than the number two competitor. While coverage volume alone does not necessarily determine the quality or business value of a PR campaign, the figure offers a useful indicator of the scale at which the firm’s media network operates.
The distinction is particularly relevant for startups and technology companies that often need to establish credibility while competing against better-known incumbents. For a young company, consistent coverage in credible media can shape how potential customers, investors, employees, and partners encounter the brand.
For executives, repeated media exposure can similarly contribute to building recognition around a specific area of expertise, particularly when coverage extends beyond a single announcement.
From Startups To Established Technology Companies
OHM’s client base reflects the broader range of companies competing for attention in today’s technology market. Its portfolio has included venture-backed startups, cybersecurity companies, AI businesses, and other technology firms seeking visibility around funding announcements, product launches, executive positioning, and broader market narratives.
The company has also worked with organizations connected to major technology investment ecosystems, including portfolio companies associated with firms such as Team8 and Insight Partners.
That breadth reflects a broader shift in how technology companies approach PR. Media coverage is no longer necessarily reserved for major product launches or annual funding announcements. Increasingly, companies use earned media as an ongoing tool to establish category leadership and build a narrative around their growth.
Why Consistency Matters
The significance of a sixth consecutive month at the top of a PR ranking is less about one month of performance and more about consistency.
Media attention can be difficult to sustain. A successful campaign may generate a burst of coverage, but maintaining visibility requires a steady pipeline of stories, relationships and distribution channels. For companies operating in fast-moving sectors such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence, that consistency can be particularly important as new competitors and technologies emerge almost every week.
OHM’s continued position suggests that its competitive advantage is not based solely on individual campaigns. Its broader media infrastructure of relationships, owned media assets, and distribution capabilities appears designed to compound coverage across multiple campaigns.
As the media landscape becomes more fragmented, PR firms are increasingly competing on their ability to create sustained visibility rather than simply deliver isolated placements. For the sixth month in a row, Hurwitz’s position at the top of the rankings and OHM’s 622% coverage advantage over the second-ranked competitor offer one measure of how that competition is playing out.



